Energy and commodity trading firms run on systems that never sit still. An E/CTRM platform such as Endur, Findur and Allegro is upgraded, patched and reconfigured many times a year, and any one of those changes can move a regulated report, a position or a number, with no trade placed.

This whitepaper explores why constant change has become a hidden regulatory risk, and what it takes to prove a change is safe before go-live, not after.

Get your copy

| 8-minute read

Prove it first, not after the fact

You usually find out later, in a rejected report, a breached limit, an audit finding or a regulator's letter. By then it isn't the cost of testing you're facing, it's the cost of remediation, penalty and reputation.

Download your copy to learn how to:

See how a routine change slips through as an E/CTRM upgrade moves a regulated output with no trade placed

Understand where manual testing runs out, and why screen-level checks can't reach the logic that drifts
Map the rules that now expect evidence: EMIR Refit, REMIT II, SOX and position-limit rules
Prove a change is safe before go-live with logic-level regression, before and after, and timestamped evidence
See the honest limits, stated plainly: what this approach does, and what it doesn't.

Who should read this?

This whitepaper is written for anyone accountable for regulated outputs in energy and commodity trading, including:

- Compliance and regulatory reporting leads

- Internal Audit

- CFOs and financial controllers (SOX)

- Heads of Market Risk

- Trading IT and change management

- Programme and delivery leaders responsible for upgrades.

The cost of later is the one nobody budgets for.

Turn constant change into defensible evidence

Prove it first, not after the fact

Who should read this?